At ZetaChain, our mission is to build the Universal Blockchain that makes using Web3 as simple and unified as the Internet for both humans and AI.

Cross-chain development today means deploying the same logic on multiple chains, managing fragmented liquidity, coordinating asynchronous messages, and navigating bridge security risks. Projects like Polkadot, Cosmos, and Internet Computer (ICP) each pioneered different approaches to blockchain interoperability — but each still requires multi-chain thinking.

ZetaChain offers something fundamentally different: one smart contract that natively orchestrates all blockchains — including Bitcoin — through validator consensus. No bridge protocols, no separate deployments, no multi-chain coordination logic.

This article compares ZetaChain with other major cross-chain Layer-1s, showing why ZetaChain's universal model provides a simpler, more secure path to building the next generation of cross-chain applications.

ZetaChain in Brief

ZetaChain is a Proof-of-Stake Layer-1 blockchain built with the Cosmos SDK and CometBFT consensus engine.

It connects to external blockchains at the validator level, allowing developers to build truly omnichain dApps that interact with any network directly.

Core components:

• Observer-Signer Validators: observe external blockchains and reach on-chain consensus about events like deposits or transfers.

• Threshold Signature Schemes (TSS): validators collectively sign outbound transactions — no multisig custodians or wrapped assets.

• ZetaChain EVM: an Ethereum-compatible environment where developers deploy Universal Smart Contracts to orchestrate logic and assets across all connected chains.

• ZRC-20 tokens: protocol-managed representations of native assets (BTC, ETH, USDC) that move securely across chains without bridges.

Unlike modular ecosystems that rely on multiple subchains or relay hubs, ZetaChain operates as a single, unified blockchain — the "hub of all hubs."

In ZetaChain’s hub-and-spoke model, ZetaChain serves as the central hub while every connected chain functions as a spoke. This makes the architecture far more scalable and simpler than point-to-point systems like Axelar, LayerZero, or Wormhole, where complexity grows as more chains are added.

Because ZetaChain acts as the universal hub, incoming cross-chain calls are gas-less — developers and users don’t need to pay gas on the source chain when interacting with ZetaChain. Competing models charge gas for every bridge or relay call, while ZetaChain’s design allows free inbound execution, minimizing cost and friction for both dApps and end users.

📘 Learn more: ZetaChain Developer Portal

The Cross-Chain Layer-1 Landscape

Three protocols shaped how we think about cross-chain interoperability:

• Polkadot introduced a Relay Chain + Parachain model for shared security. It uses Agile Coretime for flexible blockspace markets, Elastic Scaling for dynamic core allocation, and supports 6-second block times for parachains within the ecosystem.

• Cosmos uses the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol for sovereign blockchains. IBC v2 extended connectivity to Ethereum using ZK-enabled verification, expanding beyond Cosmos SDK chains.

• Internet Computer (ICP) developed Chain Key Cryptography (Chain Fusion) to let canisters sign transactions on Bitcoin and Ethereum, with Solana and Dogecoin integrations in development.

Each protocol excels at connecting blockchains within and beyond their ecosystems. However, their architectures still require different integration approaches for different chains — separate parachains, independent blockchains, or canister-specific implementations.

ZetaChain provides a single unified contract layer where all blockchains are accessed the same way, through validator consensus.

Architectural Comparison

Key Distinction: While Polkadot and Cosmos have expanded their reach (with Polkadot enabling elastic scaling and 6-second block times, and Cosmos connecting to Ethereum), ZetaChain's architecture uniquely provides validator-level observation and signing for all connected chains through a single unified smart contract environment.

Security and Trust Models

ZetaChain

ZetaChain's validators achieve Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus on every cross-chain event.

They collectively observe external blockchains and agree on transaction validity before executing related actions on ZetaChain.

Outbound transfers use TSS, preventing any single validator from holding private keys.

Economic alignment is enforced by staking and slashing — validators lose stake for incorrect cross-chain behavior.

This architecture combines on-chain verification with native control over external assets, removing the need for external bridges or multisigs entirely.

Other Cross-Chain L1s

• Polkadot: Relies on shared relay chain security; parachains inherit this through the Agile Coretime model. External connections to non-parachain networks require bridge solutions like Snowbridge for Ethereum. The planned JAM upgrade will evolve the relay chain architecture with permissionless code execution.

• Cosmos: Emphasizes sovereignty; blockchains secure themselves, and inter-blockchain messages use IBC light clients. IBC v2 enables direct Ethereum connections using ZK-enabled verification at approximately $0.97 per transaction, though this involves light client verification rather than validator-level observation. IBC expansion to Solana, Base, and Arbitrum is in development.

• ICP: Uses cryptographic signing through Chain Key Crypto with subnet consensus and NNS governance rather than validator staking on external chains.

ZetaChain's approach merges validator-based consensus with external chain signing at the protocol level — creating a unified, economically bonded trust layer where the same validator set secures all connected networks.

Cross-Chain Execution and Composability

ZetaChain

Developers deploy once on the ZetaChain EVM and can immediately:

• Trigger actions from any connected chain (e.g., Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana).

• Execute complex logic involving multiple assets and networks.

• Send transactions or mint tokens back to external chains atomically.

This enables Universal Smart Contracts — contracts that can read, write, and control assets anywhere, without deploying separate versions or bridging liquidity.

📘 Learn more: Universal Apps Guide

Polkadot

Asynchronous Backing enables 6-second block times with 4x larger blocks, Elastic Scaling lets parachains dynamically access multiple cores for high throughput, and Agile Coretime replaced auctions with flexible blockspace markets. The XCM format allows efficient parachain communication within the ecosystem.

However, interactions with external chains like Bitcoin or Ethereum still require bridge infrastructure (such as Snowbridge for Ethereum). Smart contracts must be deployed on each parachain separately, and cross-chain logic becomes parachain-specific rather than universal.

Cosmos

Cosmos offers inter-chain communication through IBC. IBC v2 enables Ethereum connections using ZK-enabled verification at a cost of under $1 per cross-chain transaction. Cosmos EVM (formerly Evmos) is open-sourced for EVM integration, and Interchain Security allows blockchains to lease security from Cosmos Hub.

However, contracts must still be deployed on each zone separately, cross-chain coordination involves asynchronous message passing rather than atomic execution, and Bitcoin integration requires separate bridge solutions.

Internet Computer

ICP's Chain Fusion technology enables canisters to sign transactions for Bitcoin and Ethereum directly through threshold cryptography. Solana integration is in progress (Helium milestone), along with Dogecoin support (Meridian milestone). Subnet storage is at 2 TiB with support for on-chain AI models.

However, ICP uses a non-EVM environment with custom languages (Motoko, Rust), though Solidity support is available through Bitfinity. The development experience differs significantly from standard EVM tooling, requiring learning canister-specific patterns.

ZetaChain's Advantage: A single smart contract deployment that natively orchestrates all chains through validator consensus, using familiar EVM tooling, without requiring separate deployments or bridge protocols for each network.

Developer Experience and Ecosystem

For simplicity, ZetaChain offers the most direct path:

• Write once in Solidity.

• Access every chain through one unified environment.

• Test locally with native cross-chain simulations.

• Deploy to a single location that connects to all networks.

While Polkadot offers customization through parachains and Cosmos provides sovereignty through independent zones, both require multi-chain considerations. ICP provides cross-chain capabilities but with a different development paradigm. ZetaChain focuses on making cross-chain development as simple as single-chain development.

Economic Security and Governance

ZetaChain unifies economic security under one token — ZETA — giving validators and delegators direct stake in the security of all connected chains. When a validator observes Bitcoin, Ethereum, or any other chain and signs transactions via TSS, they do so with their ZETA stake at risk.

Why Choose ZetaChain

Polkadot, Cosmos, and ICP each offer different approaches to cross-chain interoperability. Polkadot focuses on parachains with shared security, Cosmos enables sovereign zones with IBC messaging, and ICP provides Chain Fusion for external chain signing.

ZetaChain takes a different approach: a unified architecture where a single smart contract natively reads from and writes to any blockchain through validator consensus and TSS.

Key advantages:

• True native interoperability — Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other chains are first-class citizens, not bridged afterthoughts

• Single deployment point — write once, orchestrate everywhere

• Validator-secured cross-chain operations — the same staked validators who secure ZetaChain also observe and sign for external chains

• EVM familiarity — use Solidity, Hardhat, and standard Ethereum tooling

• Atomic cross-chain execution — multi-leg operations across chains execute as unified transactions

• No bridge trust assumptions — TSS eliminates separate bridge validators or custodians

Polkadot specializes in customizable parachains, Cosmos in sovereign zones, and ICP in computational capacity. ZetaChain makes cross-chain development as simple as building on a single chain.

For building omnichain DeFi, cross-chain wallets, or universal NFT marketplaces, ZetaChain provides a direct path from idea to deployment without fragmenting code, liquidity, or user experience across multiple chains.

Conclusion

Polkadot connects parachains through a shared relay chain. Cosmos links sovereign blockchains via IBC messaging. ICP uses Chain Fusion for external chain signing. Each requires different approaches for different blockchains.

ZetaChain's approach:

A single blockchain where validator consensus and TSS connect all blockchains uniformly. Atomic execution through a unified EVM environment. Bitcoin becomes programmable without bridges.

This unified architecture — native rather than bridged, validator-secured rather than multi-hop — provides a simpler foundation for building applications where every blockchain is accessible through one smart contract environment.

About ZetaChain

ZetaChain is the first Universal Blockchain with native access to Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and more, offering seamless user experience and unified liquidity to the next billions of users. With its Universal EVM, ZetaChain empowers developers to build Universal Apps that operate natively across any blockchain, creating a fluid crypto ecosystem from a single platform.

Follow ZetaChain on X (Twitter) and join the conversation on Discord and Telegram. Reach out to [email protected] if you’re building on top of ZetaChain.